The racism of John McCain

by twit

There are two possible alternatives to John McCain being a racist.  On one hand, he could simply be a bumbling old man who has trouble explaining himself in unscripted town hall meetings.  On the other hand, he could just be pandering to his perception of the racism in his supporters.  However, if we proceed on the idea that McCain is not simply a bumbling old man nor simply pandering to his base, it appears that only one conclusion remains.

When I watched the livestream video of the McCain/Palin town hall in Grand Rapids Michigan on September 17, 2008, I was shocked to hear the word associations made by John McCain when he was asked about “Hispanics.”

From a generalized question, McCain leaped to “immigration,” “illegal,” “criminal,” “drugs,” and his classic condescending line about “God’s children.”  His answer rolled out as if he considered all Latinos to be immigrants, that the main issue related to the Latino community was “securing our borders,” and as if his main concerns about the Latino community was managing the “supply” of illegal immigrants and stopping drugs from coming across the American border.

For the record, the US Census Bureau reports that of the 35,238,481 people counted as “Hispanic” in 2000, “About 7 out of every 10 Hispanics residing in the United States were either native or naturalized citizens.”

The Grand Rapids Press reports on September 18, 2008 that “[w]hile Martinez did not specifically ask about illegal immigration, that was the question McCain answered.”

Unfortunately, in a stunning breach of journalism ethics, the Grand Rapids Press edited out some of the more unseemly parts out of McCain’s answer, even though the full response can be heard in an audio file on the Grand Rapids Press site.

I have not been able to find a full transcript of the September 17, 2008 town hall, so I transcribed the question and answer in order to discuss it here.

The relevant portion of the audio recording begins at about 43:40 (after the medical malpractice question).

Q: Again I’d like to say welcome to Grand Rapids.  I want you to know that I not only am I a proud Hispanic, I am also a proud Republican Hispanic. (applause) For me, it’s an honor to be a surrogate for your campaign, and I know that right now there’s a lot going on in the Hispanic community, and I would like some pointers from you as to what message we can continue to give to the Hispanic community for you.

A: Thank you very much.  Very briefly, my friends, the issue really is immigration reform.  We tried twice to pass comprehensive immigration reform and we failed because the American people did not believe that we would secure the borders. So, we obviously have to secure our borders, but we also have to have a temporary worker program that works, with tamper-proof biometric documents, so that people can come here and work temporarily, if necessary, but then return to the country that they came from.

And that, my friends, if we can put that into effect, plus securing our borders, then the supply, the number of people who are trying to come to this country illegally, will be dramatically reduced, because they know if they get here, then they are unable to obtain a job.

And let me just say a word about securing our borders.  It’s not just people that’s coming across our southern border, my friends, it is drugs.  And the President of Mexico is in a transcendent struggle right now because the drug cartels are literally taking over towns on the Mexican border.  So we have to work with them, because we know what the ultimate destination of those drugs is, and we know who it kills.  So it’s not just securing the border from people coming illegally, it is also the flow of drugs across our border.

And I’m happy to tell you, for the first … maybe not for the first time, but certainly, the President of Mexico, a man named President Calderon, is trying to work very hard, for the security of his own country, to help us fight these drug cartels.

So, and the other finally, my friends, there are 12 million people who have come here illegally. In my view, in my view there are about 2 million of them who have come here illegally and committed crimes.  They have to be deported or put in prison, anybody who does that. (applause)  But, there are also millions of Hispanics here who have come here and they have been law-abiding, good citizens, et cetera.  We have to address this issue in a humane and compassionate fashion.  They are still God’s children, as we are all God’s children. (applause)  So we have to do that.

And finally let me just mention about immigration reform.  Some tough decisions were taken, Senator Obama did the bidding of the labor unions and went out and tried to kill the temporary worker program that was part of comprehensive reform.  I tried to fix it, and he tried to kill it. (… light applause)

As McCain’s answer makes clear, one of the major issues facing the Latino community is the incorrect and racist assumption that all Latinos are immigrants who have recently arrived in America.  Not only did he fail to address the issue of racism, he fed into the poisonous perception that Latinos are not Americans.  His one mention of the citizenship of Latinos was qualified with the introduction about how they have “come here” and in the context of his discussion of illegal immigration.  It is clear that he did not mean “citizen” in the sense of legal citizenship, but instead that he believes that there is a vast majority of illegal immigrants who are “law abiding.”  This is particularly clear as his answer continues and he asks that these Latinos be treated in a “humane” manner and not simply deported or imprisoned like the “2 million” who have “come here illegally and committed crimes.”

I find it interesting that the Grand Rapids Press decided to edit out the line about “tamper-proof biometric documents.”  The Grand Rapids Press reports McCain’s answer as follows:

“We tried twice to pass comprehensive immigration reform and we failed because the American people did not believe that we would secure the borders,” he said. “So we obviously have to secure our borders but we also have a temporary worker program that works, so people can come here and work temporarily and return to the country they came from.”

My transcription of the first part of McCain’s answer (with emphasis added to highlight the differences) is as follows:

Very briefly, my friends, the issue really is immigration reform.  We tried twice to pass comprehensive immigration reform and we failed because the American people did not believe that we would secure the borders. So, we obviously have to secure our borders, but we also have to have a temporary worker program that works, with tamper-proof biometric documents, so that people can come here and work temporarily, if necessary, but then return to the country that they came from.

It is quite clear in the fuller quote that when John McCain hears the word “Hispanic,” he believes “the issue really is immigration reform.”

Going deeper into the issue of “biometric documents,” McCain appears to be  talking about collecting biological information from people allowed into America on a “temporary” basis.  This is quite the thicket of a human rights issue, since the collection of “biological” information treads on fundamental rights:

Our criminal justice system is premised on the notion that one can only be penalized after one commits an offense; one cannot be punished merely for having the propensity to offend.

Similarly, the Constitution could not permit a sibling to be criminally punished merely for the status of being related to an offender, nor could it be said that a sibling loses privacy expectations of being free of searches merely because he is related to an offender. But were a law enforcement official to use a DNA databank as a tool to gather information not about an offender contained therein, but about an offender’s sibling, that official would be conducting a genomic search on an assumed innocent person without having to first justify this level of intrusion – without having to show probable cause for the genomic search.

Putting aside the real danger that declaring the Constitution and its Fourth Amendment inapplicable for some people on American soil creates a significant threat to the rights of all Americans (hey there, Jose Padilla), what we have here is an issue of perception.

Americans have a right to be free of intrusions into their physical privacy because we are all assumed innocent until proven guilty, and we have a right to be free from intrusion unless probable cause exists.  However, John McCain clearly has a perception that temporary workers should be treated as if they are all potentially criminals.

In the context of the recent US Supreme Court decision about the detainees at Guantanamo Bay, we should know better than to try to eviscerate the integrity of the US Constitution, but John McCain is already on record expressing his contempt for the founding principles of our nation.  As Ben Franklin famously said:

“Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.”

There is a lot of discussion that can be had on the constitutional implications of this issue.  However, at this point, the issue of “biometric documents” appears to be an illustration of McCain’s perception of an inherent criminality in people he would allow into America on a temporary basis.  This seems to underline the way McCain looks at the issues facing the Latino community, and his targeting of this community as “immigrants” and “illegal.”

It is important to remember that John McCain is a terrible public speaker and that this could all be a long and rambling gaffe.  If that is the case, John McCain should immediately apologize to the entire Latino community for accidentally contributing to dangerous racism against Latinos.  John McCain should apologize to all Americans for his contribution to a culture of hate and intolerance.

update: This kind of behavior is not new for John McCain.  The implied meaning of his infamous use of the “gook” slur was described in the Seattle Post-Intelligencer on March 2, 2000 as follows:

We’ve made tremendous progress as a nation in overcoming racism. That is why it is so disturbing that a major candidate for the U.S. president can perpetuate the stereotype of Asians as permanent foreigners, hurtling us backward to a time and a place where such racial epithets were an acceptable part of mainstream discourse.

It is casting a group of people as “permanent foreigners” that is the theme in the language used by John McCain at the town hall and on his campaign bus in 2000.  In his answer to a question about “Hispanics,” it was as if he went out of his way to describe the Latino population as “permanent foreigners.”

Related:

Sarah Palin Rallies the KKK

The difference between the KKK and Sarah Palin?

Advertisements

9 Responses to The racism of John McCain

  1. TheROSA says:

    What I’d really love to see is the look on the face of this ‘Proud’ Hispanic republican and only hope to catch a glimpse of the moment she realized the campaign she is supporting. I can’t belive that any truly intelligent person, or just anyone with brain function, would not pick up on the sadness of his response.
    God Help Us ALL!

  2. ROSA,

    you raise an important point. I didn’t go far enough in the original version of this post. John McCain does not simply owe an apology to the Latino community – he owes an apology to ALL Americans. I’m about to update this post to reflect this point.

    John McCain has offended the foundational principles of this country with his ugly and divisive campaign tactics. His vision of America is one that sets groups against each other, draws false divisions and inflames irrational hatred and fear. That’s not the America that I believe in.

    Thank you for reminding me.

  3. Pingback: Sarah Palin rallies the KKK « The Church of the Apocalyptic Kiwi

  4. Pingback: American racism: Not dead yet « The Church of the Apocalyptic Kiwi

  5. polanyi says:

    unfortunately the biometrics thing is even being embraced “across the aisle”–Chuck Schumer is infatuated with ID cards measuring people’s irises, microchips, etc. This technotronic stuff is out of hand, and the FP advisers behind Obama are not a good sign either–too much control all around

  6. Realistic one says:

    Do white people realize they are being out numbered and are quickly becoming the minority in this country?

  7. I think “quickly becoming the minority” is an overstatement. Another way to look at it is that we are all becoming “minorities” over the next 50 or so years.

    For example, according to Pew on Feb 11, 2008:

    # Nearly one in five Americans (19%) will be an immigrant in 2050, compared with one in eight (12%) in 2005. By 2025, the immigrant, or foreign-born, share of the population will surpass the peak during the last great wave of immigration a century ago.
    # The major role of immigration in national growth builds on the pattern of recent decades, during which immigrants and their U.S.-born children and grandchildren accounted for most population increase. Immigration’s importance increased as the average number of births to U.S.-born women dropped sharply before leveling off.
    # The Latino population, already the nation’s largest minority group, will triple in size and will account for most of the nation’s population growth from 2005 through 2050. Hispanics will make up 29% of the U.S. population in 2050, compared with 14% in 2005.
    # Births in the United States will play a growing role in Hispanic and Asian population growth; as a result, a smaller proportion of both groups will be foreign-born in 2050 than is the case now.
    # The non-Hispanic white population will increase more slowly than other racial and ethnic groups; whites will become a minority (47%) by 2050.

    http://pewsocialtrends.org/pubs/703/population-projections-united-states

    According to the US Census in 1996:

    The White population, the largest of the five race/ethnic groups, is projected to be the slowest-growing among the groups during the 1995 to 2025 projection period. During this period, the White population is projected to account for more than one- sixth of the absolute increase in the Nation’s population in all regions except in the Northeast (where this group declines in size). Sixty-seven percent of the 16 million Whites added to the U.S. population will be located in the South. After the year 2005, the West will replace the Northeast as the third largest region for the White population. The South is expected to continue to have the largest share of the Nation’s White population.

    Over the 30 years, the Black population is projected to be the second slowest-growing in all regions, except the South where it will rank third. Sixty-four percent of the nearly 12 million Blacks added to the United States during 1995 to 2025 will be in the South.

    In 1995, the Black population was the second most populous group in all regions but the West, where it ranks fourth. However due to the faster growth in the Hispanic origin population, by 2025, the proportion of Hispanics surpass the Black population share in the Northeast and the Nation.

    The Asian population is the fastest-growing group in all regions. Asians are the fourth largest of the race and Hispanic origin groups in all regions except the West where they rank third. The Asian population is projected to have the greatest gains in the West with an increase of 7 million persons (56 percent of the total added to the U.S. Asian population during 1995 to 2025) and in the Northeast with an increase of 2 million.

    The American Indian population, the least populous group, is projected to be the third fastest-growing population in all regions but the South during 1995 to 2025 where it ranked fourth. Nearly half of the 0.8 million American Indians added to the Nation’s American Indian population will be located in the West.

    The Hispanic origin population is projected to increase rapidly over the 1995 to 2025 projection period, accounting for 44 percent of the growth in the Nation’s population (32 million Hispanics out of a total of 72 million persons added to the Nation’s population). The Hispanic origin population is the second fastest-growing population, after Asians, in every region over the 30 year period.

    In 1995, the Hispanic origin population is the third most populous race/ethnic group in all regions except the West where it ranks second. The Hispanic population is expected to comprise a substantially larger share of the total population in 2025 than in 1995 — up from 21 to 32 percent in the West, from 9 to 15 percent in the South and Northeast, and from 3 to 6 percent in the Midwest.

    http://www.census.gov/population/www/projections/ppl47.html

  8. Pingback: The difference between the KKK and Sarah Palin? « The Church of the Apocalyptic Kiwi

  9. TL Winslow says:

    The age-old pesky U.S.-Mexico border problem has taxed the resources of both countries, led to long lists of injustices, and appears to be heading only for worse troubles in the future. Guess what? The border problem can never be solved. Why? Because the border IS the problem! It’s time for a paradigm change.

    Never fear, a satisfying, comprehensive solution is within reach: the Megamerge Dissolution Solution. Simply dissolve the border along with the failed Mexican government, and megamerge the two countries under U.S. law, with mass free 2-way migration eventually equalizing the development and opportunities permanently, with justice and without racism, and without threatening U.S. sovereignty or basic principles.

    Click the url and read about the new paradigm for U.S.-Mexico relations.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: