maybe someday we’ll elect a democrat

by lestro

We did?  Who?

Certainly you can’t mean President Obama:

President Obama abruptly pulled back proposed new national smog standards Friday morning, overruling the Environmental Protection Agency’s efforts to compel states and communities nationwide to reduce local air pollution in the coming years or face federal penalties.

The move represented a win for the business community, which had lobbied to postpone new restrictions on ground-level ozone — known as smog — until 2013 in light of the economic downturn. It also raised questions about the fate of several other air quality regulations the EPA is preparing to finalize this year.

Well there has to be a good reason, right?  Surely it can’t be that same old bullshit about how investing in the environment has to wait for financial reasons, especially at a time when corporate profits are literally at record highs, right? Let’s go right to the source, the White House press release:

At the same time, I have continued to underscore the importance of reducing regulatory burdens and regulatory uncertainty, particularly as our economy continues to recover. With that in mind, and after careful consideration, I have requested that Administrator Jackson withdraw the draft Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards at this time.

goddammit.

Ozone, for the record, is a greenhouse gas (which means that even if you don’t believe in such things it traps heat in atmosphere, warming the planet) that is the principal component in smog formation. It harms lungs, causes respiratory distress and is linked to asthma, bronchitis, heart attacks and premature death.

And how can you be sure this is a terrible, terrible move?

House Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-Va.) identified several of these regulations as targets for a regulatory rollback the House will vote on this month, and House Speaker John Boehner’s (R-Ohio) spokesman Michael Steel hailed Obama’s decision Friday as “a good first step.”

“If you’re serious about a jobs agenda, the last thing you want to be doing is adding tens of billions of dollars in costs every year,” said Upton, who added that under stricter smog standards communities in his district and across the nation “will lose these jobs, and they will never come back.”

But maybe I am overreacting.  I admit, it happens.  I am a hot head sometimes.  Maybe I am seeing this wrong.

“Obama utterly caved,” said Bill Snape of the Center for Biological Diversity, an advocacy group.

Daniel J. Weiss of the Center for American Progress, a liberal think tank, said, “It’s unfortunate that the administration is siding with big oil over the health of children, seniors, and the infirm.”

Nope, I’m dead on.  So let’s be very clear, this is the Democratic president once again choosing business interests over people.

According to the EPA, depending on what standard it adopted, the compliance costs for industry could range from $19 billion to $90 billion a year by 2020. The tougher standard would yield health benefits worth $13 billion to $100 billion, the agency said.

Did you catch that?  The health benefits would save us more money than this would cost industry (which, again, is seeing record profits again this year).

Now let’s take a look at the 2008 Democratic Platform, the one that got Obama elected with a huge majority and gave him supermajorities in both houses of Congress:

We understand that climate change is not just an economic issue or an environmental concern– this is a national security crisis.

Never again will we sit on the sidelines, or stand in the way of collective action to tackle this global challenge. Getting our own house in order is only a first step. We will invest in efficient and clean technologies at home while using our assistance policies and export promotions to help developing countries preserve biodiversity, curb deforestation, and leapfrog the carbon-energy-intensive stage of development.

hmm.

It is exactly this type of shit that will prevent the President from being re-elected because frankly, I am not sure we can trust a goddamn thing he says anymore, and I am starting to lose my grasp on the differences between him and his opponents, whose policies he keeps supporting.

Seriously, what’s the point in voting if even winning means losing?

Then again, maybe I was wrong, maybe he IS a Democrat.  After all, only a Democrat would take a winning strategy that has the support of the majority of the country and completely throw it out the window.

This is no way to run a country.

3 Responses to maybe someday we’ll elect a democrat

  1. Edd Friedman says:

    For the record. Ozone is NOT a greenhouse gas. It does not trap heat in our atmosphere. In the upper atmosphere it protects from harmful radiation (wherever it exists in high enough concentrations to do so), and in the lower atmosphere it is indeed an air pollutant. It is toxic to breath because it is highly reactive, stealing useful (one might even say necessary) ions from innocent molecules in human bodies. Ozone will outright kill you if you breathe it even in relatively low concentrations. Smog is what is linked to all of the respiratory illnesses you mentioned, not pure ozone.

    Now that I’m done with your fact checking I have to admit this is my general feeling about Obama as well. Obama (and the Democrats in the legislative branch — those morons who couldn’t use a supermajority to pass a resolution to find their own assholes) is totally impotent as the leader of this country. We’ve seen him endlessly kowtow to the whims of his political opponents in the name of “centrism” and “bipartisanship.” The reality is that it reeks of bipartisan-shit. There is no give on the conservative side of the aisle, and why should there be? My grandmother always said, “Why buy the cow when you can get the milk for free?”

  2. Pingback: Language is Important « The Church of the Apocalyptic Kiwi

  3. lestro says:

    Actually, Edd, ozone IS a greenhouse gas.

    Troposphere ozone acts as a greenhouse gas.

    from the Intergovermental Panel on Climate Change report’s glossary:
    http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar4/syr/ar4_syr_appendix.pdf

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

%d bloggers like this: